Solid waste management in Freetown poses costly and vexing problems. Included are low
         service coverage—averaging 40%, insufficient budgets, highly inadequate equipment, substantial inefficiencies such as
         high costs, low quality service, low labor productivity, poor public attitudes, and widespread illegal dumping. In addition,
         the long domestic insurgency heavily damaged or destroyed the existing infrastructure, and also, significantly contributed
         to the more than two-fold increase in population from estimated 850,000 in 1994 to the current estimates of 1.85M. In terms
         of waste management, there is a positive correlation between city’s population size and both the percentage of waste
         removed and the rate of households enjoying regular waste collection. The increased population combined with the domestic
         insurgency, political strife, and accompanying economic crises had a profound impact on waste generation, straining the existing
         skeletal solid waste management (SWM) system.  
 
Coupled with changing waste management authorities,
         the Freetown’s solid waste management situation is on the verge of collapse. The large percentage of uncollected or
         illegally dumped waste in Freetown constitutes a disaster for human health and is also a cause of the environmental degradation.
         According to the local health authorities, the increased prevalence of parasites, tetanus, malaria, hookworm, cholera, and
         diarrhea in and around the city is mostly attributed to strewn wastes in the city.  
 
The management
         of Freetown’s waste is a history of institutional trials and abandonment, with most issues remaining unsolved. The newest
         authority, the Ministry of Youth and Sports (MoYS) was assigned the responsibility for in May 2003. The assignment came as
         a result of the failure of previous authorities—the Ministry of Health and Sanitation, the Freetown City Council, and
         the private sector to effectively manage Freetown’s solid wastes. Unfortunately, the MoYS is also struggling with tight
         budgets, lack of qualified manpower, and no institutional authority and experience in waste management.  
 
 It is estimated that over 742 tons/day of garbage is generated in the metro Freetown area.  Of this, over 84%
         is biodegradable organic waste, mostly from residential and vegetable markets. In addition, the limited Freetown industry
         contributes approximately 20 tons/day of wastes. Industrial wastes consist of mostly broken bottles (primarily from local
         brewery), waste cans, rags and plastic and small quantities of hazardous wastes. These wastes are usually unbagged and disposed
         by the industry at each of the landfills, at no cost. 
      
      
      
National Policy Roadmap on Integrated Waste Management 
Keep
         Sierra Leone Clean, Play your Role for Change 
Government of the Republic of Sierra Leone Ministry
         of Health and Sanitation (MoHS) 
March 2015 – Final 
 
Policy 1: Waste Management Plans shall be developed by all Local Councils • Waste Management
         Plans shall be developed and updated by Local Councils through multistakeholder consultation. MoHS will pursue making the
         preparation and update of Waste Management Plans a legal requirement and ensure the National Wastes Management Working Group
         (NWMWG) oversees the process. • The NWMWG shall develop key sector performance indicators that each local council will
         require to incorporate into their local waste management plans to enable clear benchmarking of waste management performance
         over time and between locations throughout the country. • Plans shall incorporate all policies within this document and
         incorporate experiences gained from initiatives and stakeholders including: Public Health Aides operating under the Expanded
         Sanitary Inspection and Compliance (ESICOME) programme, Bo City waste management programme, Makeni Waste to Wealth programme,
         the Freetown Faecal Sludge Program, etc. 
 
Policy 2: The roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders
         shall be clearly defined.  • Roles and responsibilities shall be clearly defined and agreed upon within
         local waste management plans (see section 3.3 and Annex 1). • Stakeholders shall know, respect and fulfil their function,
         roles and responsibilities with regard to the entire waste management chain for different waste streams. • A National
         Wastes Management Working Group, led by MoHS and the EPA will be set up to issue directives clarifying roles and responsibilities.
         The need to establish a national waste management unit - an independent interdisciplinary governing body responsible for planning
         and management of waste and resource management affairs throughout the country and implementing bodies - will subsequently
         be evaluated. • Consideration shall be given to assigning community/neighbourhood organisations a formal role in monitoring
         the delivery of local services acting in collaboration with Public Health Aides in undertaking sanitary inspection and compliance
         activities under the ESICOME programme..  • Informal waste pickers shall be recognised as recyclers and as such
         integral service providers in the waste management chain rather than outcasts. To this end these groups will be supported
         (both financial and training) to join forces with the local authorities.  • Enhancing effective and proper sector
         coordination between all stakeholders and projects in general will improve the sector throughout the country. 
 
Policy 3: An integrated planning and management approach for all waste streams shall be adopted along with a regional
         approach to treatment and disposal.   • MoHS and EPA working group shall establish and maintain a
         national program for providing planning, technical and financial assistance to local governments for all waste streams. •
         Where practical, local councils shall work with neighbouring councils to develop plans and utilise shared facilities for the
         management of all their waste streams. 
 
Policy 4: Educational and skills transfer programmes shall
         be developed and continuously implement and updated.  • A national curriculum for continuous professional
         training and development shall be developed and established by the MoHS / EPA sector working group, to include inter-council
         exchange  National Policy Roadmap on Integrated Waste Management    visits and networking.
         This is to include refresher training, to be organized by MOH’s, for Health staff and Public Health Aides  •
         Experiences in the implementation of locally appropriate waste management solutions shall be transferred from project sites
         to stakeholders nationally via the MoHS /EPA sector working group through Technical Vocational Education and Training. Successful
         initiatives – such as the Waste to Wealth work by the Living Earth Foundation in Makeni building capacity of social
         enterprises and community based organisations and similar experiences from WHH in Bo - will guide design of future curriculum
         and development-partner interventions. • MoHS (in collaboration with EPA and MLGRD) will promote a training and development
         strategy focused on creating a motivated workforce, skilled and competent in their assigned functions. • Staff members
         in Health Care institutions shall be trained in identifying and separating out Hazardous Health Care Waste (HHCW), and safe
         handling and management. Health care institutions shall ensure the resources are available to treat HHCW in accordance with
         best practices, ensuring that this material does not enter the municipal solid waste stream where it poses a serious health
         risk to the general populace.  
 
Policy 5: The polluter pays
         principle shall be applied to the management of all waste streams to ensure cost recovery • Emphasis must be
         placed on ensuring that those responsible for the generation of wastes pay the costs associated with its environmentally acceptable
         handling and management. • Implementing a pay as you throw (PAYT) direct house-to-house fee applied and collected by
         the waste management operator shall be evaluated and implemented where appropriate. • Public Health aides should be empowered
         through the ESICOME programme to provide inspection and compliance enforcement of the polluter pays principle where implemented. 
         • Measures to recover the material value in the waste streams, through re-use, recycling and recovery shall be pursued
         where economically viable. • Ensuring enforcement by sanitary court is in operation for all defaulters after the issuing
         of abatement notice/court order 
 
Policy 6: Only technologies appropriate to the local conditions
         shall be employed. • All stakeholders shall pursue the application of technologies that are suitable - from
         an affordability, applicability and sustainability perspective - in all aspects of the waste management chain. Modernisation
         does not necessarily require full mechanisation of the waste management system.  • All aspects of the waste management
         chain must be capable of being procured and fully and sustainably operationally financed by sustainable revenues. Optimise
         the use of locally available resources and established practices first. • Upgrade (and manage) a select number of existing
         dump sites to be controlled landfills first, to create a positive core waste management system foundation, prior to pursuing
         new sites and new treatment technology alternatives • Proven toilet systems that minimise or avoid liquid waste discharge
         by providing an alternative to “conventional” flush toilet sewage / conservancy tank systems shall be pursued.
         This may include composting and waterless toilets that assist negate the need for sewer infrastructure. 
 
Policy
         7: An enabling environment for private sector participation in service provision shall be established and sustained.  
         x Local Councils shall enhance waste management planning, education, enforcement and cost 
National
         Policy Roadmap on Integrated Waste Management    recovery mechanisms – the combination of which shall
         represent an enabling framework for private sector participation.  x Local Councils shall be strengthened in their essential
         “client role” (see Annex 1, “Client Function”). This shall include their ability to understand and
         deliver upon: a. Establishing clear local standards and guidelines (comprising performance indicators) for the appropriate
         management of all aspects of the waste chain for all waste streams  b. Development of local bye-laws to enable meaningful
         enforcement and monitoring (i.e. through the ESICOME programme) to address littering; illegal dumping, burning etc –
         providing the means to punish offenders and poor operators whilst empowering/rewarding good operators and practices; c. Issuance
         of contracts (including micro-contracts and Memorandums of Understanding (MoU)) and/or franchises (including legal guarantees)
         in an open and transparent bid process with defined re-tendering intervals; d. Ensuring performance based contracts are issued
         and ensure efficient and effective monitoring of contractor/franchisee performance against established performance indicators
         to ensure compliance – and to take appropriate corrective measures where necessary (through empowering Public Health
         Aides to assist monitor and enforce contractor performance through the ESICOME programme). e. Designing and implementing appropriate
         educational/awareness programmes using all appropriate mediums (radio, TV, printed press, street theatre etc) with a focus
         on schools. f. Enabling Private Sector Participation (potentially to include responsibilities for planning/zoning, licencing,
         service performance guarantees etc.)  g. Establishing and enhancing basic cost recovery mechanisms and options including
         pursuing clear tariff policies including rights to delegate collection of tariffs  h. Work with local banking and financing
         institutions to assist the private sector access and secure (with guarantees) micro-financing/banking loans to build their
         business. x Regulations shall define specific standards – include strengthening the application and issuance process
         of permits and licenses by the EPA; x Basic minimum waste management service standards shall be established by MoHS and EPA
         for all aspects of the waste management chain. 
 
Policy 8: The Waste Management Hierarchy shall be
         applied to the management of all waste streams. • Solutions to safely and responsibly manage their waste appropriately
         shall be created, available and communicated to all waste generators.  • The 5Rs (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Recover,
         Residual Waste Management) principle will guide planning by all stakeholders for all waste streams. • Landfill is an
         essential pillar in any integrated waste management system and controlled landfill sites shall be in place in all local waste
         management systems. Establishing fully operational and enforcing the use of controlled landfills (improved and authorised
         dumpsites) within logistical/economic distance of all major waste generating centres will be prioritised. • Efforts to
         recover the value associated with waste resources, moving practices up the waste hierarchy, shall be investigated and pursued
         where economically viable. • The valuable role of the “informal sector” within recycling activities is recognised.
         • Priority is given to health and safety of all workers involved in the handling of materials.